In the cutthroat arena of AI, where innovation moves at warp speed and compute costs balloon like a supernova, OpenAI is betting the farm on a familiar Silicon Valley playbook: hook 'em with free, then upsell the boss.
Just as Zoom and Slack exploded during the pandemic by luring individual users into corporate workflows - converting 5-10% of free riders into enterprise gold - OpenAI is quietly pushing ChatGPT's freemium model toward the boardroom.
Today, roughly 5% of its 800 million weekly active users pony up for the $20/month Plus plan, but the real prize lies in convincing those same users' employers to spring for team-wide subscriptions at $25-60 per seat. It's a strategy that's already netted over 5 million business users as of late 2025, up from 3 million in June, and could propel OpenAI to the ranks of subscription behemoths.
By 2030, OpenAI's internal forecasts paint an audacious picture: 2.6 billion weekly users churning through ChatGPT, with 8.5%—or 220 million souls - opting for paid tiers. That's a user base rivaling the entire internet's early days, excluding China's firewall.
At $20 per month, those subscribers could generate $52.8 billion annually, but factor in enterprise upsells and emerging ad integrations (like the freshly launched Shopping Assistant, which scouts deals and earns commissions), and projections climb toward $129 billion in total revenue, per HSBC analysts. It's ambitious, but not without precedent.
Netflix boasts 300 million paid subs at $11.70 average revenue per user (ARPU) globally ($17.20 in the U.S. and Canada), while Spotify pulls $5.20 ARPU from its 300 million crowd. Microsoft's Office 365, the enterprise kingpin, commands 450 million paying users at around $10-15 ARPU. ChatGPT's $20 sweet spot slots right in, suggesting OpenAI could eclipse them all if it nails the conversion.
Yet, beneath the glossy user stats lurks a fiscal black hole that could swallow entire economies. OpenAI's compute hunger is insatiable: to train and run models like GPT-5, the company has locked in $1.8 trillion in cloud commitments through 2033, including $250 billion with Microsoft Azure, $300 billion with Oracle, and $38 billion with AWS.
By HSBC's math, just the data-center rental bill hits $620 billion in 2030 alone - equivalent to the GDP of Sweden - and cumulative infrastructure spend from late 2025 to 2030 totals $792 billion. Only a third of that contracted capacity will even be online by decade's end, thanks to grid bottlenecks and chip shortages. Power demands? A staggering 36 gigawatts, enough to light up a mid-sized country, with each gigawatt costing $50-60 billion to build out.
Nvidia and AMD are only too happy to fuel the fire - and their own bottom lines. Nvidia's $100 billion investment in OpenAI, announced in September 2025, buys non-voting shares while committing to supply chips for 10 gigawatts of AI data centers starting H2 2026 with the Vera Rubin platform. AMD counters with a multi-year deal for 6 gigawatts of Instinct GPUs, sweetened by warrants letting OpenAI snap up 10% of the chipmaker for pennies.
These "circular" pacts - where suppliers invest in customers to guarantee demand - have ballooned OpenAI's war chest to $60 billion raised historically, but they also expose a house of cards. If demand falters, unused capacity reverts to Nvidia gobbling it up through 2032, per side deals with partners like CoreWeave.
HSBC's crystal ball is rosier on users but brutal on the ledger: 3 billion weekly actives by 2030 (44% of the global adult population, sans China), with 10% converting to paid - yielding $213 billion in revenue. Toss in 2% of the $6.5 trillion digital ad market ($130 billion slice for all LLM firms), and OpenAI's cut could hit $174 billion from consumer AI alone, plus $87 billion from search integrations.
Yet, even this leaves cumulative free cash flow negative at -$207 billion through 2030. It's a yawning gap, but oddly modest in Big Tech terms: comparable to Meta's or Google's annual haul, and dwarfed by the post-2030 revenue tsunami Altman envisions.
Emerging revenue streams - like video generation via Sora 2.0, agentic AI tools, and the Shopping Assistant - aren't even fully baked into these models, potentially shrinking the hole further.
Skeptics whisper of an AI bubble, with circular financing echoing the dot-com era. Microsoft's Q1 2026 filings already booked a $3.1 billion hit from its 27% OpenAI stake, implying the startup's quarterly losses top $11.5 billion. Competition heats up too: Anthropic and xAI snag single-digit market shares, while Google's Gemini and Alibaba's Qwen erode OpenAI's 71% consumer dominance to 56%. Regulators loom, probing antitrust in these interlocking deals.
Also read:
- How James Cameron Outsmarted the Internet Trolls and Saved Avatar from Becoming “Smurfs in Space”
- China's AI Edge: Practical Innovation Over Raw Power, Goldman Sachs Strategist Argues
- Turkmenistan Breaks New Ground: Legalizes Cryptocurrency Mining and Exchanges
For now, though, Sam Altman's gamble feels less like roulette and more like chess. With $500 billion valuation and a nonprofit facade masking profit-sharing wizardry, OpenAI is positioned to dominate - if it stays atop the user pyramid. The $207 billion chasm? Just fuel for the next funding lap. In AI's megacycle, as HSBC dubs it, burning cash to build the future isn't a bug; it's the feature. Forward, indeed.
Author: Slava Vasipenok
Founder and CEO of QUASA (quasa.io) — the world's first remote work platform with payments in cryptocurrency.
Innovative entrepreneur with over 20 years of experience in IT, fintech, and blockchain. Specializes in decentralized solutions for freelancing, helping to overcome the barriers of traditional finance, especially in developing regions.
