15.07.2025 08:18

Nobody Reads the Terms of Service: TikTok Creators Shocked by CapCut’s Content Rights

News image

In the fast-paced world of content creation, TikTok creators are reeling from a stark reminder: always read the Terms of Service.

A recent wave of backlash has erupted after creators discovered that CapCut, ByteDance’s popular video editing app, claims extensive rights to use, share, and even delete user-uploaded content without warning. Buried in the fine print, these terms grant CapCut a perpetual, royalty-free license to exploit user content for marketing, share it with third parties, and remove it at will.

The revelation, sparked by discussions among creators in June 2025, underscores a recurring truth: nobody reads the Terms of Service — until it’s too late. Here’s what creators need to know and why this oversight could cost them.


CapCut’s Sweeping Content Rights

CapCut’s Terms of Service, accessible via its app and website, state that any content uploaded to its cloud — videos, audio, images, or templates—grants ByteDance a “non-exclusive, worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable” license. This means CapCut can use your clips in its marketing campaigns, share them with third-party partners (think advertisers or AI training firms), or delete them without notice or explanation.

While creators retain ownership of their content, they effectively surrender control over how it’s used once it hits CapCut’s cloud servers. These terms apply universally, whether you’re a free user or shelling out for the Pro subscription, which doubled in price from $9.99 to $19.99 per month in 2025, offering no additional protections.

The discovery hit hard among TikTok creators, many of whom rely on CapCut for its seamless integration with the platform, intuitive editing tools, and AI-powered features like auto-captions and effects. With over 1 billion downloads and 200 million monthly active users, CapCut is a go-to for crafting viral TikTok videos. But creators like UK-based influencer Sarah James, who shared her shock in a June 2025 TikTok post, were blindsided to learn their content could be repurposed for CapCut’s ads or shared with unspecified partners. “I thought my videos were mine,” she said, echoing a sentiment shared across creator communities.


Same Old Story: Terms Ignored

The terms aren’t new — they’ve been in CapCut’s agreement since its 2020 launch — but they’ve flown under the radar because, as the saying goes, nobody reads the Terms of Service. A 2024 Pew Research study found that 93% of users skip reading app agreements, and CapCut’s case is no exception. The app’s user-friendly interface and free tier make it easy to dive in without scrutinizing the fine print.

Creators upload clips to the cloud for convenience — collaborating with teams, accessing projects across devices, or using CapCut’s AI tools — unaware that they’re handing ByteDance a blank check to exploit their work. Even Pro subscribers, paying $19.99 monthly for premium templates and ad-free editing, get no exemptions, despite the price hike fueling expectations of greater control.

This isn’t unique to CapCut. Similar controversies have rocked platforms like YouTube, where Google uses videos to train Veo 3, and Instagram, where Meta’s data policies allow content reuse. ByteDance, CapCut’s parent, has faced scrutiny for its data practices, including a $5.7 million EU fine in 2023 for mishandling children’s data. Yet, CapCut’s terms are standard for cloud-based apps, where companies prioritize flexibility to innovate—often at the expense of user clarity.


The Risks for Creators

The implications are significant. CapCut’s license means your viral dance video could appear in a global ad campaign without your consent or compensation. Third-party access raises concerns about AI training — could your content be used to fine-tune models like ByteDance’s Seedance or Doubao, mimicking your style or voice? Deletion without warning is another worry; creators risk losing months of work stored in the cloud, with no recourse. For small creators building personal brands, this feels like a betrayal, especially since CapCut markets itself as a creator-friendly tool.

The Pro subscription’s price doubling has added fuel to the fire. At $19.99/month, creators expected enhanced rights or privacy, but the terms remain identical to the free tier. This has sparked accusations of exploiting creators’ trust, with some, like TikTok creator @TechBit, calling it “a cash grab disguised as a creative tool.” The lack of opt-out options for cloud uploads — short of avoiding the cloud entirely — further limits creator control.


Protecting Yourself in the Creator Economy

The lesson is clear: don’t upload sensitive content to CapCut’s cloud. Creators can mitigate risks by editing locally, using CapCut’s offline mode, or storing projects on personal devices. Tools like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, while pricier, offer greater control without cloud-based licensing traps. For those sticking with CapCut, watermarking videos before uploading or limiting cloud use to non-sensitive assets can reduce exposure. Reviewing Terms of Service — tedious as it is — remains critical, especially as AI and data-driven platforms dominate the creator economy.

ByteDance has yet to respond to the backlash, but CapCut’s support page emphasizes that users retain ownership and can request content removal, though the process is opaque and doesn’t revoke the license. As creators push for transparency, some are exploring alternatives like Kinemaster or InShot, which offer similar features with less invasive terms. However, CapCut’s seamless TikTok integration and free AI tools make it hard to abandon entirely.


Also read:


A Wake-Up Call for Creators

The CapCut controversy is a stark reminder that in the creator economy, convenience comes at a cost. Platforms like CapCut thrive on user content, but their Terms of Service often prioritize corporate interests over creator rights. With 78% of TikTok creators using CapCut, per a 2025 Influencer Marketing Hub report, the app’s influence is undeniable — but so is the need for vigilance. As one creator put it, “We’re building their AI empire with our videos, and we didn’t even know.” Until platforms offer clearer terms or opt-out mechanisms, creators must protect themselves by reading the fine print — or keeping their content out of the cloud.


0 comments
Read more