Substack Says 50+ Publications Make $1 Million—but the Odds Stay Hidden
In August 2026, Substack’s page for media founders still lists 50+ publications making over $1 million annually. The page also says Substack takes 10% of paid-subscription revenue and that its network generates roughly 30% of new paid subscribers, but it does not publish the underlying earnings distribution.
The current wording preserves the seven-figure milestone while changing its unit from the original account. On June 3, 2025, Bill Bishop recorded CEO and co-founder Chris Best saying onstage at The Information’s Future of Influence event in Los Angeles that more than 50 people were making over $1 million a year on Substack.
The distinction matters because a publication can be a solo newsletter or a media business with multiple employees and contributors. It also remains impossible to convert the headline into a reliable success rate: The Associated Press found that more than 50,000 Substack publishers made money, but the company did not disclose the total number of people producing content on the platform.
What the seven-figure threshold actually measures
The verified claim demonstrates that reader-funded publishing can support dozens of businesses with annual revenue above $1 million. It does not establish that every qualifying operation belongs to one writer or that its owner personally retains seven figures.
Substack’s public language also leaves important accounting questions unresolved. The company does not provide a complete roster, anonymized account-level records or a methodology explaining whether the threshold reflects cash collected during a defined period, a recurring-revenue run rate or broader business income handled through the platform.
Those measures can diverge even for the same publication. An annualized run rate extrapolates from subscriptions active at a particular moment, while cash received over the preceding year changes with sign-ups, cancellations, refunds, discounts and the timing of monthly or annual payments.
The safest conclusion is therefore narrow: Substack currently identifies more than 50 publications above a $1 million annual threshold, but the figure is neither an audited income distribution nor a measure of personal take-home pay. It describes the platform’s upper tier, not the experience of a typical publisher.
Gross subscription revenue is not creator income
Substack’s 10% platform charge means that a publication generating $1 million in paid-subscription revenue would retain $900,000 before payment-processing costs. Taxes and operating expenses would reduce the amount available to its owner further.
The expense gap can be small for a solo writer with limited overhead or substantial for a publication employing editors, reporters, producers and customer-support staff. Legal services, freelance commissions, travel, software and audio or video production can all be funded from the same revenue described by the headline number.
Subscription price also changes the audience required to cross the threshold. In a simplified example, a publication charging $100 per year needs 10,000 full-price annual subscriptions to produce $1 million in gross billings. At $10 per month, it needs about 8,334 readers paying continuously for a full year.
These examples are arithmetic, not forecasts. They exclude churn, refunds, complimentary access, promotional pricing and gradual audience growth, all of which can make the required subscriber base larger than the simple calculation suggests.
Why 50,000 monetized publishers do not provide the odds
Dividing more than 50 seven-figure operations by more than 50,000 monetized publishers may appear to produce a rate of roughly one in 1,000. That calculation is not defensible because both figures are open-ended, and the available descriptions use different units: people, publishers and publications.
The eligible population is also undefined. One person can operate multiple publications, while a publication can have multiple contributors; some accounts publish only free material, and others may turn on payments but collect very little. Without a consistent unit, observation period and total population, the probability that a new publisher will reach the threshold cannot be calculated.
The headline also contains no information about how long the leading publications took to grow, whether their founders arrived with established audiences or how many previously successful publications later contracted. A snapshot of the current upper tier demonstrates that the outcome is possible but cannot reveal the route, cost or failure rate beneath it.
What the milestone says about Substack’s business
The figure is meaningful for Substack because large paid publications validate its revenue-sharing model. At a 10% platform charge, every $1 million in qualifying subscription revenue corresponds to $100,000 for Substack before the company’s own costs, although the public threshold does not disclose the combined billings of all qualifying publications.
Built-in discovery can also contribute commercial value beyond payment processing and email delivery. Yet the claim that the network supplies roughly 30% of new paid subscribers is a platform-wide metric; it does not mean every publication receives that share of its customers internally or that discovery produces equal results across subjects.
For creators, the evidence supports two conclusions at once. Reader payments can finance publications at substantial scale, including full media operations, but the seven-figure count offers no benchmark for median revenue, profitability or the likelihood of reaching that scale.
The lasting significance of Best’s June 2025 remark is therefore more limited—and more credible—than the original headline implied. Substack has maintained the 50+ threshold in its current marketing, now framed around publications, while the data needed to judge how representative those successes are remains unavailable.
Also read:
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get the latest Web3, AI, and crypto news delivered straight to your inbox.