11.07.2025 14:10

Job Search Giants Glassdoor and Indeed Lay Off 1,300 to Embrace Artificial Intelligence

News image

In a surprising turn of events, two of the world’s leading job search platforms, Glassdoor and Indeed, have laid off approximately 1,300 employees as part of a strategic shift toward artificial intelligence.

Both companies, owned by the Japanese corporation Recruit Holdings, are replacing human workers with AI-driven solutions, though specific breakdowns of the layoffs between the two platforms remain undisclosed.

Indeed stands as the world’s largest job aggregator, operating in 60 countries and boasting 250 million unique monthly users. Its vast database connects job seekers with opportunities across the globe, making it an indispensable tool for employment searches.

Glassdoor, on the other hand, complements Indeed by offering a wealth of employer reviews, salary insights, and interview experiences, empowering users to make informed decisions about potential workplaces. Together, these platforms form a powerful duo, often used in tandem by job seekers and employers alike.


Also read:


The decision to cut jobs reflects a broader industry trend, with Recruit Holdings betting on AI to streamline operations and enhance user experiences. The move has sparked mixed reactions, especially given the irony of job search platforms reducing their own workforce due to automation. As one affected individual put it, “I’m looking for work because AI fired me from a job search site.” This sentiment underscores the growing unease as artificial intelligence reshapes even the industries designed to support employment.

While the layoffs signal a pivot to efficiency, they also raise questions about the future of work. Recruit Holdings’ focus on AI suggests a future where technology could dominate recruitment processes, potentially at the expense of human oversight. For now, job seekers relying on these platforms may need to adapt to an increasingly automated landscape while the companies refine their AI-driven strategies.


0 comments
Read more