How Much of Substack Is Actually Written by AI?

Journalist Taylor Lorenz just ran the numbers — and the results are surprisingly reassuring for anyone who still values a human voice on the internet.

In 384 out of 575 posts, Pangram found zero traces of AI assistance. That means roughly two-thirds of the content dominating Substack leaderboards today was written by real people, not machines.
But dig a little deeper into the categories, and a clearer pattern emerges.
Where AI Is (and Isn’t) Taking Over

- Technology — 28% (nearly one in every four posts);
- Philosophy — 23%;
- Health — 22%.
These numbers make sense. Tech, philosophy, and health newsletters often lean heavily on data, research summaries, trend analysis, and systematic breakdowns — exactly the kind of analytical grunt work where AI excels as a research and structuring assistant.
On the other end of the spectrum, the more “human” categories remain remarkably AI-resistant:
- Culture — 13%;
- Sports — 5%;
- Food & Cooking — 3%;
- Music — 1% (the absolute lowest).
In other words, when the content is about taste, opinion, personal storytelling, or lived experience, creators are still doing it the old-fashioned way.
The Real Story Behind the Numbers
The pattern is telling: the more analytical and data-heavy the newsletter, the more likely authors are turning to AI to process information, organize thoughts, and polish drafts. AI has become a powerful co-pilot for turning raw research into readable prose.

People aren’t ready to outsource their voice, their perspective, or their lived experience to a language model — at least not yet, and certainly not on the platforms where authenticity matters most to readers.
Also read:
- AI as a Time Machine: Returning to the Past Through Digital Snapshots
- The Streaming Wars Take Flight: How Starlink is Reshaping In-Flight Entertainment
- Not Microdramas, But TikTok Dramas: The Platform Is Now Actively Producing Its Own Mini-Series
- Don’t Try to Leave YouTube
What It Means for the Future of Substack

Substack’s top writers are proving that the platform’s biggest strength remains the same as it always was: the direct, unfiltered connection between a real human writer and their audience. AI can help with the scaffolding, but it still can’t replace the soul of the piece.
For now, at least, the majority of what you’re reading on Substack’s bestseller lists is still being written by actual people. And in an age of increasingly sophisticated AI content, that feels like genuinely good news.