The Trump administration has rolled out a comprehensive 23-page AI Action Plan aimed at cementing U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence by slashing regulations and boosting energy capacity for data centers.
Crafted by White House AI czar David Sacks, alongside advisors Sriram Krishnan and Michael Kratsios, the plan signals a bold shift in the nation’s tech policy landscape.
A striking feature of the document is its mandate that federal agencies procure only language models deemed “free from ideological bias.” Notably, this excludes mentions of misinformation, diversity, and climate change from the definition of bias, effectively reversing the AI safety framework established under the Biden administration. Critics argue this move dismantles safeguards designed to ensure ethical AI development, raising questions about the long-term implications for transparency and accountability.
The plan’s approach to funding adds another layer of controversy. The White House proposes withholding federal grants from states that impose “burdensome” AI regulations, a policy that echoes Big Tech’s earlier push for a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI oversight. This has fueled accusations of corporate lobbying, with some suggesting the move prioritizes tech giants’ interests over public welfare or regional innovation.
On the global stage, the plan addresses competition with China by advocating for stronger export controls, leaving specifics to the Department of Commerce. This comes on the heels of the department’s recent approval for Nvidia to supply H20 chips to China, hinting that any controls may remain symbolic.
Proponents justify this as a strategic concession to maintain U.S. companies’ competitiveness in the Chinese market, though skeptics see it as a lack of resolve in countering Beijing’s AI ambitions.
Also read:
- BlackRock’s Assets Under Management Soar to a Staggering $12.5 Trillion in Q2 2025
- Mukesh Ambani, India’s Richest Man, Gets Even Wealthier as JioStar Reports Record Performance
- Claude Faces Billion-Dollar Lawsuit Over Piracy Allegations
The plan’s most practical element focuses on energy infrastructure. With AI systems consuming energy on par with entire cities, the proposal to expand nuclear and geothermal power generation could prove pivotal. By prioritizing reliable, scalable energy sources to support data centers, the administration aims to address a critical bottleneck in the AI race. This pragmatic focus may well determine the plan’s success, offering a tangible solution to the surging power demands of cutting-edge technology.
As the U.S. pivots toward this deregulated, energy-driven AI strategy, the balance between innovation and oversight remains a contentious issue. The plan’s outcomes will likely hinge on how effectively it navigates these tensions while keeping pace with global competitors.
