A California federal court has greenlit a massive class-action lawsuit against Anthropic, the developer of the AI model Claude, accusing the company of illegally downloading seven million books from pirate websites.
The lawsuit, seeking damages of up to $1 billion, claims these pirated books were used to train Claude, raising serious questions about copyright infringement and the ethics of AI development.
The financial stakes for Anthropic are staggering. Under U.S. copyright law, damages for willful infringement could reach $150,000 per illegally downloaded book. With seven million books allegedly involved, the potential penalties could be astronomical, threatening the company’s viability.
While prior court rulings have deemed training AI models on publicly available content legal, even without author consent, the use of pirated materials falls outside this precedent. The distinction lies in the deliberate acquisition of copyrighted works from illicit sources, which the plaintiffs argue constitutes a clear violation of intellectual property rights.
Also read:
- Pentagon Awards $200 Million Contracts Each to OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, and xAI for Advanced AI in Defense
- The World of Instant Wishes—Atlas of Impossible Worlds
- Prompting Is More Than Just “Write Me a Text”: PrompTessor, the Free Swiss Army Knife of Prompt Engineering
Anthropic has yet to publicly respond to the allegations, but the case could set a landmark precedent for how AI companies source data for training models. As the lawsuit progresses, it will likely spark broader debates about the balance between technological innovation and the protection of creative works.
The outcome of this case could reshape the AI industry’s practices and have far-reaching implications for copyright law in the digital age.
