27.01.2026 09:24Author: Viacheslav Vasipenok

Netflix's Approach to Storytelling: Deliberately Simplifying Dialogues and Breaking Traditional Film Structures?

News image

In a candid discussion on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast (episode #2440, aired in January 2026), Academy Award-winning actor Matt Damon, alongside longtime collaborator Ben Affleck, opened up about their experiences working with Netflix on their new action thriller The Rip (released January 2026).

Damon revealed how streaming platforms like Netflix are reshaping filmmaking to accommodate modern viewing habits — particularly the widespread use of phones as a "second screen" during watching. These revelations have sparked debates about whether such changes are "dumbing down" content or simply adapting to audience behavior.

Damon's comments highlight a fundamental shift: Netflix prioritizes viewer retention over cinematic tradition, leading to requests for more repetitive exposition, front-loaded action, and reduced emphasis on visual sophistication.


1. Repetitive Dialogue and Plot Recaps for Distracted Viewers

One of the most striking points Damon made was Netflix's encouragement to reiterate plot points multiple times in dialogue. He explained that executives suggest it "wouldn’t be terrible if you reiterated the plot three or four times in the dialogue because people are on their phones while they’re watching." This approach ensures viewers who glance away (a common behavior, with studies showing up to 94% of people multitask on devices during TV viewing) can quickly catch up without losing context.

This isn't isolated to The Rip. Reports from writers and critics describe Netflix's "casual viewing" strategy, where characters explicitly announce actions, emotions, or recaps (e.g., "We spent a day together... Tomorrow I’m marrying Paul Kennedy" in *Irish Wish*). Such overt exposition — often called "second-screen writing" — helps retain subscribers who watch in fragmented sessions, but it can feel redundant or unnatural to attentive audiences.

Critics argue this contributes to a broader "dumbing down" of content, reducing nuance and subtlety in favor of clarity. Actress Jameela Jamil echoed similar concerns in late 2025, stating that intentional simplification leads to "a less nuanced, less interesting, less thoughtful society."


2. Front-Loading Action Scenes to Hook Viewers Early

Damon contrasted traditional action movie structure with Netflix's preferences. Classically, films build to three major set pieces: one in the first act, one in the second, and the climactic (and most expensive) finale in the third. "You spend most of your money on that one in the third act. That’s your finale," he said.

Netflix, however, reportedly pushes for a major action sequence "in the first five minutes" to combat quick drop-off rates. In an era of endless scrolling and competing content (YouTube, TikTok), the platform uses data showing high early abandonment to demand immediate hooks. This inverts the classic build-up, prioritizing retention metrics over narrative pacing.

While effective for binge-watching or background viewing, it can make films feel rushed or unbalanced, as the biggest spectacle arrives too soon.

3. Reduced Focus on Visual Quality for Smaller Screens

Damon also noted that some directors invest less effort in cinematography for Netflix projects, knowing many viewers watch on phones or laptops rather than large TVs or theaters. Home viewing offers a "very different level of attention" — lights on, distractions everywhere — compared to the immersive cinema experience.

This aligns with observations that Netflix content often prioritizes clear, straightforward visuals over intricate framing or subtle details. While not universal (prestige projects like Oscar contenders receive more care), it reflects data-driven pragmatism: why craft elaborate shots if most consumption happens on small screens?


4. The Upsides: Riskier Projects and Lower Marketing Costs

Despite criticisms, Damon and Affleck acknowledged Netflix's advantages. Streaming allows more experimental or "risky" content without theatrical box-office pressure — no need to share 50% of grosses with cinemas. Algorithms handle discovery and promotion, reducing reliance on expensive marketing campaigns.

The Rip itself benefited from this model, achieving high viewership quickly as a Netflix original. Affleck pointed to exceptions like the critically praised series *Adolescence* (shot in continuous takes), proving not all Netflix content follows the simplified formula—high-quality exceptions can thrive.

Also read:


Conclusion: Adaptation or Erosion of Craft?

Matt Damon's insights from the Joe Rogan podcast underscore a tension in the streaming era: Netflix optimizes for real-world habits (multitasking, short attention spans) to maximize watch time and subscriber retention. This leads to deliberate choices like repetitive dialogue, early action peaks, and scaled-back visuals.

While these tactics boost engagement metrics and enable diverse storytelling, they risk homogenizing cinema — favoring accessibility over artistry. As Damon put it, such changes "are going to really start to infringe on how we’re telling these stories."

Whether this is smart business evolution or a step toward shallower entertainment remains debated. For now, as phones stay glued to hands during viewing, Netflix's formula appears here to stay — reminding us that content is increasingly shaped not just by creators, but by how (and how distractedly) we consume it.


0 comments
Read more