Gamification is when you grind for points instead of knowledge, and a smug owl shames you for it.
Two weeks ago, I deleted Duolingo from my phone and canceled my subscription. For a year and a half, I logged in every day, kept my streak alive, racked up points, and completed quests. The result? I can name a couple hundred Chinese characters, say “nǐhǎo,” and ask for someone’s phone number - but I can’t hold even a basic conversation.
Duolingo isn’t about learning languages. It’s a masterclass in how gamification and psychological tricks keep users hooked while delivering far less than they expect.
How I Fell Into the Trap
In 2024, I decided to learn Chinese - a complex language with characters that promised access to a new culture. I started with an app called Laoshi, created by my friend Danil Khasanshin. It had flashcards for Chinese characters and a cool calligraphy course. I learned that characters are built from a limited set of components and follow specific writing rules. It was interesting, but the content was limited, and progress felt unclear. I didn’t get hooked.
Then I thought: why not try Duolingo? It offered Chinese with pronunciation practice (Pinyin) and character writing (Hanzi). I dove in - and got sucked into the vortex.
The Mechanics of Addiction
Duolingo’s gamification is relentless. Every lesson earns you experience points (XP) - 10 to 15 per lesson, with multipliers that can push you into the hundreds. Each week, you’re thrown into a league with 15-25 random users, competing for leaderboard spots. The higher the league, the fiercer the competition.
Then there’s the streak: the number of consecutive days you complete at least one lesson. You can “freeze” it, but only with a paid subscription. There are daily quests, achievement badges, and a widget that shows the owl’s mood based on your activity.
It’s a psychological pressure cooker. Notifications nag you: “Time’s running out!” “Your streak is in danger!” “Your friends are passing you!” If you’re a perfectionist, you’re doomed. The longer your streak, the higher your rank, the more the app exploits your commitment.
When you’re consistent, it’s all friendly vibes. Skip a day, and the owl turns passive-aggressive: “You’re really going to quit now?” “You can still fix this!” Ignore it longer, and the tone shifts to outright shade. But if you ghost the app for too long, the owl flips to groveling: “It’s been five days. I just wanted to help you learn Chinese.”
It’s manipulation 101: from stick to carrot and back again.
The Real Problem: Learning Becomes Grinding
The deeper you go, the more you’re trapped in a feedback loop. At first, you do lessons to learn. Then, to keep your streak. Then, to stay in your league. Then, to complete a quest or snag a badge.
Eventually, you start gaming the system: which exercises give the most XP for the least effort? Long lessons? Too slow. Better to tap pre-filled answers - faster, fewer mistakes, more points.
Duolingo encourages this. With a subscription, you can make unlimited mistakes and retry lessons endlessly. There’s no real test of knowledge.
Over 18 months, I built a 555-day streak. I earned badges for eight out of nine months in 2025, often outperforming 95% of Duolingo users. It looks impressive. But it’s meaningless.
Also read:
- Does Rudeness Boost AI Performance? The Curious Case of ChatGPT’s Temperament
- Artificial Intelligence Won’t Make You Rich
- Shein's Parisian Debut: A Fast-Fashion Fiasco Amid French Fury
- Pasta, Bread, and Cookies: The Unlikely Culprits Behind Your Anxiety and Depression, New Study Suggests
It’s a Business, Not Education
I互
Recently, I considered joining a proper Chinese language school - one with real knowledge checks, practice, and exams. That’s when it hit me: all this time, I was just appeasing the owl, not learning Chinese.
From a business perspective, Duolingo’s mechanics are flawless. Users pay for subscriptions, grind lessons, and feel engaged. But Duolingo’s goal isn’t to teach you a language - it’s to make money off you.
You can learn something if you build a mental wall between the app’s retention tactics and actual studying. But that’s not the optimal path. The app will still try to manipulate you because that’s what it’s designed to do.
If you learn anything, it’s despite the owl, not because of it.
