09.02.2026 06:48Author: Viacheslav Vasipenok

Cryptography and Personal Accountability: The World Approach

News image

In an era where artificial intelligence blurs the lines between human and machine, the World project — formerly known as Worldcoin —emerges as a bold attempt to reclaim digital spaces for real people. Co-founded by OpenAI's Sam Altman and Tools for Humanity's Alex Blania, World aims to foster human prosperity amid the rise of AI bots.

Its mission is straightforward yet revolutionary: provide universal proof of humanity, inclusive finance, and genuine connections, ensuring that services like financial apps, trading platforms, social networks, dating sites, and video games remain accessible only to verified humans.

By leveraging biometrics and cryptography, World doesn't just verify identity; it enforces a layer of personal accountability that could reshape online interactions.


The Foundation: Biometrics as the Key to Humanity

At the heart of World is its biometric verification system, powered by spherical devices called Orbs. These orbs scan a user's iris to generate a unique cryptographic hash, creating a World ID — a privacy-preserving digital passport that proves someone is a unique human without storing sensitive data.

Unlike traditional methods relying on emails or phone numbers, which are easily spoofed by bots, World's approach uses zero-knowledge proofs to maintain anonymity while confirming authenticity. This system, operational in over 160 countries with millions of users, addresses the bot infestation plaguing platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where spam, manipulation, and hate speech run rampant.

Recent developments hint at even grander ambitions. Reports suggest a small team, possibly tied to OpenAI, has been working since at least April 2025 on a biometric social network designed exclusively for humans. This platform would use Orbs or integrated tech like Apple's Face ID to eliminate bots, creating a "humans-only" space where real interactions thrive.


Combating Deepfakes: The Deep Face Innovation

World ID 3.0, announced recently, takes verification further with features like enhanced privacy through Anonymous Multi-Party Computation (AMPC) and new credentials for storing passport info locally. But the standout is Deep Face, a tool designed to thwart deepfakes in real-time scenarios like video calls.

By comparing live video streams against pre-verified biometric data from an Orb scan, Deep Face detects mismatches caused by AI filters or impersonations. If a discrepancy arises—say, in a FaceTime or Zoom session — the system blocks authorization, ensuring the person on the other end is genuinely you.

This isn't about guessing if content is AI-generated, a futile task given the limitations of current detectors. Instead, World's architects, including Altman, emphasize cryptographic provenance: proving the source of data through unforgeable digital signatures.

For videos and posts, the focus shifts to hardware integration. Future smartphone cameras could "sign" files at the moment of capture using keys tied to a user's World ID, embedding metadata via standards like C2PA to confirm the content was captured by a physical lens, not synthesized by neural networks.


Personal Accountability: From Verification to Consequences

Here's where cryptography meets responsibility. In the World ecosystem, posting under a verified World ID isn't just about proving you're human — it's about owning your actions. If a user shares misinformation or deceptive content, their reputation could suffer, potentially leading to revoked access to services.

This model places accountability squarely on the author: a verified account signals that a real person stands behind the content, making it easier to trace and penalize harmful behavior.

Altman and Blania envision this as a bulwark against AI-driven chaos, where bots and deepfakes erode trust.  By tying digital identities to biometrics, World promotes a system where users are incentivized to act responsibly, knowing their actions are linked to their real-world self — albeit anonymously through cryptographic means.

Also read:


Teleporting to the Future: A World of Enforced Accountability

Let's fast-forward under a few assumptions: Suppose Altman's vision succeeds, birthing a thriving biometric social network that draws users away from bot-riddled alternatives. Imagine regulatory bodies endorse these verification methods, mandating personal responsibility for content originality and accuracy.

In this hypothetical 2030s landscape, victory over AI-generated slop comes via legalized accountability. To engage with fellow humans — whether posting, trading, or dating — you must operate under a biometrically linked account.

Share something deemed disinformation by platforms, companies like OpenAI, or even governments? Your social rating plummets. Initially, you lose posting privileges or ChatGPT perks; escalate further, and real-world repercussions follow, like higher mortgage rates or restricted financial access.

This dystopian-tinged utopia raises profound questions. On one hand, it could restore authenticity to online discourse, curbing the spread of fakes and bots that currently amplify division. Cryptography ensures privacy isn't sacrificed entirely, with zero-knowledge proofs shielding personal data. Yet, the risks are stark: Who defines "disinformation"? Centralized control by tech giants or states could stifle free speech, turning accountability into censorship. Biometric data, even hashed, invites privacy nightmares if breached.

Is this "normal"? It depends. In a world overrun by AI, such measures might be necessary for human-centric digital spaces. But they demand rigorous safeguards — transparent governance, user ownership, and ethical AI integration — to prevent a slide into surveillance capitalism. As Altman and Blania push forward, the real test will be balancing security with liberty in this brave new World.


0 comments
Read more