Encore Leads the Public Debt-Buyer Comparison—but Private Rivals Stay Opaque
Encore Capital Group is the largest debt buyer supported by a clear, like-for-like comparison of major publicly traded specialists. The latest complete annual evidence leaves that answer unchanged but makes its basis more precise: Encore’s 2025 Form 10-K lists $1.408 billion in portfolio purchases, $2.593 billion in collections and $9.660 billion in portfolio estimated remaining collections at year-end. Its US purchases through Midland Credit Management accounted for $1.170 billion of the total.
The closest transparent comparison is PRA Group. PRA Group’s 2025 Form 10-K lists $1.209 billion in portfolio purchases, $2.108 billion in cash collections and $8.609 billion in estimated remaining collections; US purchases were $590.1 million. Encore led on each of those measures, but the comparison cannot establish an absolute global ranking because private buyers do not all publish equivalent data.
Why the answer depends on what “largest” means
A debt buyer owns purchased accounts, unlike a collection agency that may pursue payment for somebody else without acquiring the debt. The CFPB’s definition of debt buyers covers companies that purchase past-due obligations and then collect directly or employ other collectors. A business can therefore be a large collector without being a comparably large buyer.
There is also no universal accounting measure called “debt-buyer size.” Possible yardsticks include annual purchase expenditure, the face value of accounts acquired, annual collections, revenue, receivables carried on the balance sheet and expected future recoveries. Each describes a different part of the business.
Purchase expenditure is the most direct measure of current buying activity because it shows how much capital a company deployed to acquire portfolios during a common period. On that basis, Encore spent about $199.6 million more than PRA in 2025. That comparison is much more useful than combining one company’s annual purchases with another company’s quarterly revenue or portfolio face value.
The purchase price should not be confused with the balances consumers allegedly owe. Encore’s accounting tables attach a face value of approximately $11.878 billion to portfolios bought for about $1.408 billion during 2025. The difference reflects the expected difficulty, expense and uncertainty of recovering charged-off accounts; it does not mean every account was acquired at the same percentage of its balance.
Encore’s lead extends beyond purchases
The 2025 figures show a broader advantage rather than a lead confined to one spending line. Encore collected approximately $485.2 million more from its portfolios than PRA during the year. Its portfolio estimated remaining collections were about $1.051 billion higher at year-end.
The US comparison is more pronounced. Encore’s $1.170 billion of domestic purchases was close to twice PRA’s $590.1 million. That supports describing Encore as the leading publicly disclosed US buyer for the period, while stopping short of claiming that every privately held competitor bought less.
Estimated remaining collections, commonly shortened to ERC, is an estimate of future gross recoveries from portfolios already owned. It is not cash in the bank, guaranteed proceeds, company revenue or market value. Forecasts may change with collection performance, consumer payment behavior, exchange rates and revisions to management assumptions.
ERC is nevertheless useful when comparing businesses with similar operating models. It captures the prospective collection scale embedded in their portfolios, whereas annual purchases show only the capital deployed during one year. Encore leads PRA under both views, reducing the risk that the ranking depends on a single unusually active purchasing period.
The company behind the ranking
Encore Capital Group is the consolidated parent rather than one collection office. Midland Credit Management is its principal US operating platform, while Cabot Credit Management is its main European business. Naming Encore in the ranking captures purchases and collections across the group; treating Midland as the whole company would exclude its European operations.
PRA Group is a useful comparator because purchasing and collecting nonperforming loan portfolios is also central to its business and because it publishes geographic and portfolio-level figures. Other market participants may specialize by account type, acquire portfolios through investment funds or combine debt ownership with fee-based servicing. Those differences make a comprehensive league table difficult to construct.
Revenue alone would produce a less reliable answer. Servicing fees can arise from accounts a company does not own, while portfolio income depends on accounting estimates and the timing of expected recoveries. A revenue ranking could therefore measure business mix rather than the scale of debt purchases.
What this ranking does—and does not—tell consumers
A buyer’s corporate size does not determine whether a particular collection claim is accurate. For an individual account, the material facts are the identity of the current creditor, the original creditor, the amount claimed, the account information and the available dispute process. The legal entity named in the collection communication matters more than the parent group’s position in an industry comparison.
The discount paid for a portfolio also does not automatically reduce the balance a buyer seeks to collect. Portfolio pricing reflects expected recoveries, costs and risk across a large pool of accounts; it is not an account-by-account settlement. Any payment proposal must be assessed using the terms offered for that specific obligation rather than an assumed industry purchase percentage.
The defensible conclusion
Encore Capital Group is the best-supported answer to “Who is the largest debt buyer?” It exceeded PRA Group in 2025 portfolio purchases, annual collections and estimated remaining collections, and its US purchasing volume was substantially larger.
The necessary qualification is that this is a public-company comparison, not an audited census of every debt buyer worldwide. Different metrics can change the meaning of “largest,” and incomplete private-company disclosure prevents a conclusive global superlative. For measuring current acquisition activity among transparent specialist buyers, annual portfolio purchases provide the clearest basis—and Encore leads that comparison.
Also read:
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get the latest Web3, AI, and crypto news delivered straight to your inbox.