Private Hiring Slowed to 44,000—Job Switchers Still Won 7% Pay Growth

U.S. private employers added 44,000 jobs in July, while median annual pay growth reached 7% for workers who changed employers and remained at 4.4% for those who stayed, according to ADP’s August 5 employment release. The split shows a labor market producing relatively few net private-sector positions while some employers still pay a premium to complete difficult hires.

The 2.6-percentage-point gap favors successful job switchers, but it is not a guaranteed return from changing employers. The two pay figures describe different groups of workers and do not prove that the act of switching caused the faster wage growth.

Hiring weakened as switcher pay accelerated

The July increase was less than half the revised June gain and the weakest monthly result since January. Kiplinger’s review of the private-payroll data put the previous month’s increase at 95,000 and the July consensus forecast at 75,000.

Weak net hiring and stronger pay growth for movers can occur at the same time because the measures answer different questions. The employment estimate tracks the monthly change in jobs across the covered private-sector universe; the pay readings measure median year-over-year changes among matched workers classified as stayers or changers.

An employer can therefore limit total headcount while paying more for a small number of experienced recruits. The national hiring figure captures the net result after gains and losses across industries, whereas the switcher measure reflects only workers who completed a move.

That distinction limits what the 7% figure says about the typical job seeker. It excludes unsuccessful searches and workers who considered moving but stayed. The median can also shift when the mix of occupations, industries, locations or experience levels among successful movers changes.

Health services led hiring while construction showed pay pressure

The clearest signs of continuing labor scarcity were concentrated rather than economy-wide. Axios’s account of the July results showed education and health services adding 36,000 jobs, while construction added 1,000 and recorded exceptionally strong pay growth among workers changing employers.

Those sectors show two different forms of pressure. Education and health services supplied most of the month’s net private hiring, indicating that demand remained comparatively firm. Construction produced little net employment growth, yet experienced movers retained leverage as data-center development increased demand for a limited pool of skilled labor.

The sector split is more informative than treating the national average as a description of every applicant’s prospects. Employers may still compete aggressively for credentials, technical knowledge or substantial experience even while broad recruitment slows. Concentrated demand in a few fields, however, does not establish that workers across the economy have regained bargaining power.

The switcher premium is an observed difference, not a causal estimate

The pay readings compare the medians of two populations: workers observed with the same employer and workers observed moving to another one. They are not inflation-adjusted, nor do they match otherwise identical people within the same occupation, region and experience band.

Successful movers may be disproportionately employed in fields where demand is stronger. Workers with scarce skills may also be more willing or able to change companies, while the composition of both groups can vary from month to month.

The data therefore establish that pay grew faster for the median changer than for the median stayer in July. They do not establish how much of the difference resulted from changing employers rather than worker selection, industry mix or other characteristics. For workers evaluating the headline, the premium is evidence of where leverage appeared after completed moves—not a forecast for an individual offer.

ADP and BLS payroll figures cover different employment universes

The private-employment estimate is not an advance version of the federal payroll count. It is derived from private payroll records, while the federal establishment survey covers nonfarm employers including government. The federal unemployment rate comes from a separate household survey, so it should not be read as another measure of the same payroll change.

The difference in scope became especially visible two days after the private-payroll release. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ August 7 Employment Situation showed total nonfarm payrolls down 23,000 in July and unemployment at 4.1%; local-government education lost 50,000 jobs, retail trade lost 19,000 and health care added 22,000.

A positive private-sector estimate and a negative total nonfarm estimate are therefore not directly contradictory. Government losses enter the federal headline but fall outside the private-employment measure, and the estimates are produced from different source data and statistical methods.

Taken together, the July releases show weak job creation alongside continued demand in health-related work. The next monthly data will indicate whether the switcher premium and sector concentration persist; a single month cannot establish a lasting change in hiring or compensation.

Also read:

• AI Adoption Leads to Job Growth, Not Mass Layoffs: New Study Finds Companies Hiring More After Implementing AI
• Growth Hacker Jobs are Popping up Everywhere. What’s the Growth Hacker Job Description?
• Survey Shows 97.7% of Hiring Leaders Changed Talent Locations Due to AI