Pigment Review: One Model. Finance, Sales, and HR in the Same Room.
#Quasa #QUA #pigment
Pigment is enterprise business planning with agents on a live model. FP&A, sales quotas, headcount, supply chain. Modeler Agent builds structure from plain language. Analyst Agent flags drivers. Frames puts a custom UI on the same numbers. Graphite is the calculation engine. MCP talks to Claude and other AIs. G2 sits near 4.6–4.7. There is no public price list. Buyer guides put a platform floor around $30K–$50K a year, mid-market licenses around $75K–$200K, and Year-1 all-in (license plus implementation) often $300K–$600K. Power users cost more than viewers. Modules stack. It is not a general ledger and not a cheap Cube alternative for a five-person shop. Demand the seat mix, the module list, and a variance drill on your own data before you sign.
𝐂𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗚𝗧𝗛𝗦
• One model across finance, sales, and HR
• Agents that write and explain inside the plan
• Frames for exec-facing interfaces
• Live collaboration, not file versions
• Modern UX versus legacy EPM
𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗟 𝗙𝗢𝗥
Growth and enterprise FP&A teams that have outgrown shared workbooks and will fund a real implementation.
𝗛𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧𝗦
• Scenario and driver planning
• ERP, CRM, HRIS connectors
• MCP for external AI
• Multi-year discount leverage
• Cited cycle-time cuts in customer stories
𝗣𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦
• Quote-only, easy to under-scope seats
• Implementation is a project
• Partner bench is thinner than Anaplan
• Overkill under ~500 employees
• Agents inherit dirty source maps
𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗟 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗧
4.4/5 stars. Book the demo with your messiest forecast. Count contributors, not just FP&A. Negotiate multi-year. Do not confuse a pretty board with a finished close. Earn 1 QUA reward by reviewing on Quasa.io too!
𝗚𝗘𝗧 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗗: https://quasa.io/projects/pigment























